MLSSA Web Page Topic
Previously we wanted to have the Leafy Seadragon adopted as the South Australian fish logo. The former Liberal State Government adopted the Leafy Seadragon to represent SA.
Our next focus concerned the protection of Weedy Seadragons in SA waters. The Weedy had not been afforded the protection given to the Leafy Seadragon even though it appears to be less common in our local waters.
Because of representations on 6/9/05 by Philip and Margaret Hall direct to the Premier and some of his Ministers at a Community Meeting, the Premier Mike Rann announced there and then that Protected Status was to be given to the Weedy Seadragon.
On Thursday, 16 February 2006 Minister Rory McEwen announced that all Sygnathids in SA waters were to be protected.
Western Blue Groper and the Harlequin Fish
We are now taking up the cause of these two superb fish. The Western Blue Groper (WBG) has some protection but the Harlequin Fish is unprotected.
WBG are long-lived and slow growing, taking 15 years to reach sexual maturity at 60 cm which is the minimum size they may be taken under the existing rules. They live for up to 70 years to reach a maximum size of 1.6 m. (e.g. so therefore juvenile “parrotfish” that are caught and used for bait do not have a chance to reproduce, nor do sub-adults caught on deeper reefs).
(WBG) used to be common as throughout Investigator Strait, and on the southern coast of Yorke Peninsula, but adults have not been seen on southern Yorke Peninsula since the 1960s when they were fished out. They still occur on northern KI due to their protection in the gulfs.
(WBG) have a strong population structure and they change sex with age so fishing can disrupt population structure and dynamics.
Given its longevity and diet, WBG may be a “keystone” species in the reef habitats where it occurs, and there may be ecological cascade effects from the extirpation of groper from reefs.
The questions regarding protection of the blue groper raise welfare issues which have been considered extensively in recent years, and has been well reviewed in Huntingford et al. (2006) J. Fish Biol. 68, 332-372.
It was concluded that conditions that produce unacceptable levels of anxiety, fear, stress, sickness, pain ...etc in fish should be minimised.
Although there is a closure to Western Blue Groper fishing in S.A. Gulfs and Investigator Strait waters, and the species is also protected in a number of small Aquatic Reserves, it appears that this is insufficient as a means of protecting Western Blue Groper in South Australia, because:
(i) the species does not occur in the upper and most of the central parts of either gulf due to lack of suitable habitat and oceanographic conditions, and therefore only a small part of the species range in S.A. is formally protected;
(ii) some fishers appear not to adhere to the prohibition of fishing for Western Blue Groper in Investigator Strait, or offshore reefs and islands within the closed area, the S boundary of which spans from western KI to southern Eyre, and illegal catches appear not to be monitored;
(iii) there has been increased targeting of this species in offshore areas during the past decade, particularly by charter boats operating off the central and western coasts of S.A.; and
(iv) some reef fishers do not recognise juvenile WBG when they are caught as bycatch, and small specimens are thus retained for use as bait.
Actions needed to overcome the identified threats include:
• Legislative protection - there is a clear need for the extension of the current protection for these fish. This could include listing as endangered under the EPBC Act (1999) and the National Parks and Wildlife Act as well as extension of current protection under the Fisheries Act to cover all State waters.
• The size limit on Western Blue Groper be abolished so all caught fish must be returned to the sea.
• The catching and photographing of “trophy” fish be banned, as the fish is exposed to the air for unacceptable amounts of time and their protective slime coating would be damaged by this increased handling.
• Increased and maintained research and monitoring for the species such as the Reef Watch ‘Feral or in Peril’ programme. (Western Blue Groper are currently one of the ‘in peril’ species targeted by this programme).
• Reduction and mitigation of human impacts on the marine environment and reef habitat in particular, i.e. sedimentation, excess nutrient inputs and other pollution.
• Actions and education to encourage compliance with current size and catch limits, in particular the issue of non or misidentification of juveniles by anglers needs to be addressed.
• Actions to avoid and reduce bycatch of this species. For example pot and trap designs that reduce the bycatch of fish should be encouraged
• The use of Western Blue Groper as cray pot bait should be prohibited by regulation under the Fisheries Management Act (2007).
• A number of Western Blue Groper ‘hotspots’ for both adult and juvenile fish have already been identified and these need to be protected in marine park sanctuary zones. Marine parks in conjunction with improved marine planning can also help address climate change impacts.
Regarding the other species of conservation concern here, Harlequin Fish is a southern Australian endemic with a limited geographic distribution (S.A. and W.A.), and a limited known depth range. It is a site-associated on coastal reefs, over a narrow depth range, and has vulnerable population characteristics, similar to other species in the Serranidae family. Although there is a paucity of quantitative information about population sizes, it is likely that the relative abundance of this species in S.A. is much lower than in W.A.. There is concern that abundance may have declined over time in areas where water quality is reduced, and reefs are degraded. Harlequin Fish is caught recreationally and (to a lesser extent) commercially across its range by a number of methods, with few controls on the capture, particularly in S.A., and no investigation of the potential impacts of fishing has been undertaken.